As you may have noticed, the blogosphere is all a-twitter with Best of the Decade lists. To our credit, we here at FSR have published two lists. The first was our 30 Best Films of the Decade, composed by the editorial staff here at FSR – a website that has existed for almost half of this decade. The second was the 3,186 Best Films of the Decade, composed by our own Dr. Cole Abaius. His (mostly failed) attempt at lampooning the concept of list-making, exposing it for the farce that it is.
Now that you’ve read our lists (you have read them, right?), it is time for me to direct you to some of the lists that have caught my eye over the past week or so, including various critics whose opinions I respect (and others whose opinions make me laugh). As well, the major movie review aggregators have also weighed in with picks from critics and fans. First, the critics.
Roger Ebert
There is no more recognizable name in the world of film criticism than Ebert. And ever since he’s gone blogger and attacked Twitter with a vengeance, Mr. Ebert seems to be sharper than ever (with the exception of a few confusing reviews this year). And as someone who owns an anthology of Ebert reviews in book form, I can’t help but start here – with multiple lists from the man in Chicago:
Drew McWeeny and HitFix.com
If Harry Knowles is the godfather of the movie blogosphere, Drew McWeeny is the Robert Duvall character – the lawyer who knew all of the family secrets. He’s also a damn good writer who delivered a very balanced top ten list this year. It is a very personal list, and one that hits on the big marks. As well, the HitFix staff put together a rather fun Worst Oscar Winners of the Decade list. Yes, I’m still mad about The Golden Compass. And so are they.
The AV Club
My Twitter followers (@rejects) will note that I’ve been almost obsessed with The AV Club for a while now. So they’re an easy choice, as their writing speaks to me on a level that I can’t exactly explain. Their best of the decade list is a bit high-brow, speaking to a decidedly indie crowd, but it has some very unique selections. As well, they too deliver a great list of best bad movies of the decade.
Cinematical
The fine folks over at Cinematical worked their way through just about every genre and subgenre, delivering lists detailing the Best Family Films (Live-Action) to the Best Documentaries of the decade. I would urge you to check out the following, if you haven’t already:
Shock Till You Drop
Our friends and network brethren over at Shock Till You Drop know horror. And while our Robert Fure gave you his 15 best horror flicks of the decade, they delivered a list of 25. Personally, it is very hard to argue with their list – especially their top 5.
Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly
I’ve been reading the blurby reviews of EW’s Gleiberman for years. And while his taste rarely matches mine, I’ve enjoyed his writing and his unique perspective all the while. With his best of the decade list, he’s taken some fascinating choices. Bonus points are earned for the inclusion of Moulin Rouge and Casino Royale, two great films that have not shown up on many other lists.
We Are Movie Geeks
One of my favorite up-and-coming movie blogs, We Are Movie Geeks, delivered a thorough list of the top 100 films of the decade. It’s a pretty well-rounded list for the geek set, which also receives an A for effort. Putting together a top 100 must have been quite the task:
From individual critics and bloggers, we move on to the services that bring their opinions together…
The movie review aggregator extraordinaire put together its list of the top movies, as rated by the critics of the TomatoMeter – made up of critics online, on television, in print and on the radio. Here are the top 20 films of the decade, with a minimum of 100 reviews.
Metacritic
A bit more elitist than RottenTomatoes, Metacritic includes very few online publications. Instead, they aggregated a “top selection” of critics, most of whom write for major newspapers and magazines. Their top 20 is an interesting group (scores out of 100):
The final element of this best of the decade picture is you, the users of the web. You frequent sites like IMDb, Flixter and Flickchart rating and ranking every single film that you see. The question is: how do your choices line up with the critics?
The Internet Movie Database (one of a handful of movie websites that has been around for the entire decade) released their list of the highest rated movies by users, each rated on a scale of 1–10. It is no surprise that many of these are populist movies. Though, I find it comforting to see that not all of the biggest box office winners made it into the top 25:
Finally, we have the list from 2009’s upstart addiction Flickchart, a site that forces users (quite mercilessly) to choose between sets of movies to determine which is best. This brutal system – used by over 40,000 movie fans – has yielded its own 20 best of the decade list:
So what can we derive from all of these lists? What conclusions are to be had from the decade that was? For one, Christopher Nolan seemed to play well with both critics and fans, with both The Dark Knight and Memento showing up near the top of many of these lists. Pixar also dominated the decade, which is no more evident than it is in the Flickchart list, where three of its six releases of the decade appear in the top 20. As well, you’d be hard pressed to find any one of these lists without a single Pixar film on it. Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy appears to be the franchise of the decade, showing up on just about every aggregate list. And finally, no matter how you slice it – there were some superb foreign language films in this decade. Every critical list is full of them (even our 30 best, which included 9 foreign language films).
Who do you think is right, the critics or the fans? What is the best film of the decade?