Welcome to The Queue — your daily distraction of curated video content sourced from across the web. Today, we’re watching a video essay that explores why 3D movies aren’t always immersive
Before we jump in, it’s worth remembering that movie theaters have always been in jeopardy.
The would-be assassins are legion: radio, television, home video, and now, online streaming. Over the years, the threat has largely remained the same: why should audiences spend their hard-earned money on an experience that’s worse than what they can enjoy in the comfort of their own home?
One solution has been novelty; technical flourishes that require a visit to your local movie house. You can’t fully appreciate the full extent of IMAX on your phone. And if you want to see a 35mm or (if you’re lucky) 75mm print, you’ll need to see it on the big screen. The same argument, ostensibly, applies to 3D: you have to go to a movie theater to experience the novel immersion the technology offers.
Only, as the following video essay argues, 3D’s ability to immerse audiences isn’t a guarantee. If you’re skeptical — or exhausted by discourse about 3D — I don’t blame you. But I think the essay brings something neat to the table, namely, a technical explanation of why 3D doesn’t do what it advertises. The essay focuses on four reasons why 3D’s immersive selling point falls flat: (1) the focus/convergence issue; (2) dimness; (3) the “gathering-in” effect, and (4) forced focus.
Whether or not you agree, disagree, or plain ole don’t care, I highly recommend giving the following a watch. Especially if you do care about the survival of movie theaters.
Watch “Why 3D Movies Are Not Immersive”
Who made this?
This video essay on why 3D movies aren’t always immersive was created by The Nerdwriter, a.k.a. Evan Puschak. The Nerdwriter covers everything from art to culture, to philosophy and politics. Which is to say, uh, just about anything. You can check out The Nerdwriter’s eclectic back catalog and subscribe to their YouTube channel here. And you can follow Puschak on Twitter here.
More videos like this
- Here’s another sample of the Nerdwriter’s work: a look at the comfort factor of cyberpunk.
- We love a good split diopter shot here at The Queue. Here’s The Nerdwriter on the purpose of the fake split diopter shot in Toy Story 4.
- And here’s the Nerdwriter with a penetrating look at why Top Gun: Maverick’s best scenes hit like a pop song.
- Hey, remember Passengers? That sci-fi film where Jennifer Lawrence falls in love with Chris Pratt even though he’s a big ol’ creep? Well, here’s The Nerdwriter’s take on how to save Passengers‘ script.
