Video Game High School

The absolute, must-read article of the week is “Disrupted: Indie Filmmakers” from Brian Newman at Sub-Genre . The week isn’t over yet, but the article that shows how popularity on YouTube has sidestepped the traditional indie film festival track will be tough to beat.

It may sound a bit counter-intuitive because videos that get millions of views on YouTube are How To Videos and shots of cats wearing monocles and stuff, but there are a handful of popular users that are translating a massive subscriber list (and an even bigger amount of views) into funding through KickStarter (the above image comes from Video Game High School) and IndieGoGo to raise funds for more projects. Meanwhile, filmmakers trying to find funding are still going through festivals like Sundance and, often, falling short.

It’s a fascinating theory because it seems plausible. It might not make immediate sense that making mash-ups and quirky spoofs could lead to big screen bliss, but all the elements are there.

Last year, Kevin Smith was able to four wall Red State because of one thing – his reputation. Without millions of Twitter followers and die hard fans, four walling would have been a crap shoot dependent completely on quality. It’s not to say that that can’t be done, because it can, but there’s no denying that being popular is a nice safety net. Ed Burns, who came up through the 90s festival machine, can attest to that with his latest offerings – films that he’s shared openly with fans through social media during the production process.

The explicit goal of the festival circuit is to build a following and name recognition through your work.

So is the goal of YouTube.

With festivals shifting their content to the online world, it seems clear that there’s an element of the middle man disappearing here. It doesn’t mean that festivals will evaporate or that the collective experience of discovering new talent will either, but there’s an emerging second track that has incredible potential. It’s cheaper than submitting and traveling to festivals, it has the ability to reach a larger audience more quickly, and now that funding is tied to the online world – there’s a directness to it that doesn’t involve bland chicken lunches with people with money in suits. The risk is less and the reward is similar.

There’s the prestige of festivals, but that’s a matter of time and the proliferation of online success stories. It’s doubtful that online audience funding will take away the glamor of winning Sundance or (definitely) Cannes, but if building an audience and finding money for your next project is the name of the game, how many will sacrifice the glitz for the guarantee?

What do you think? Have you funded any projects?

 


ARTICLE TAGS
Like this article? Join thousands of your fellow movie lovers who subscribe to The Weekly Edition from Film School Rejects. Our best articles, every week, right in your inbox!
  %
%  
Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!
Twitter button
Facebook button
Google+ button
RSS feed



Some movie websites serve the consumer. Some serve the industry. At Film School Rejects, we serve at the pleasure of the connoisseur. We provide the best reviews, interviews and features to millions of dedicated movie fans who know what they love and love what they know. Because we, like you, simply love the art of the moving picture.
Fantastic Fest 2014
6 Filmmaking Tips: James Gunn
Got a Tip? Send it here:
editors@filmschoolrejects.com
Publisher:
Neil Miller
Managing Editor:
Scott Beggs
Associate Editors:
Rob Hunter
Kate Erbland
Christopher Campbell
All Rights Reserved © 2006-2014 Reject Media, LLC | Privacy Policy | Design & Development by Face3