What are the Criteria for “Woman of the Year” again?

We can all breathe easy now that Maxim has finally come out with their Woman of the Year for 2008. I know what you’re thinking. How can a person be chosen for a year that hasn’t happened yet?

Because it’s Maxim, and the frat boys reading it are probably still too hung over from Peach Schnapps to realize that it’s not already 2009.

Meanwhile, Cinematical seems less than enthusiastic about Sarah Michelle Gellar’s gracing the cover. But if there’s any question as to why she was picked, despite the lackluster list of projects she has waiting in the wings, the answer is as simple as the people with subscriptions to Maxim.

She’s hot. As a friend pointed out to me, magazines were waiting on her to appear in ANY movie just for the excuse to get her in front of the camera. Not only do I have to agree, but I’m definitely not complaining. Congratulations, Buffy!

Check out her entire photoshoot below, courtesy of Maxim Online.

A veteran of writing about movies for nearly a decade, Scott Beggs has been the Managing Editor of Film School Rejects since 2009. Despite speculation, he is not actually Walter Mathau's grandson. See? He can't even spell his name right.

Read More from Scott Beggs
Get Film School Rejects in your email. All the cool kids are doing it:
Previous Article
Next Article
Reject Nation
Leave a comment
Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!