5 Horror Classics That Should Never Be Remade (and 10 That Could Be)

You read the headline correctly. The number of horror classics that could be remade outnumbers the number that shouldn’t be. I’ve bought into it. I’ve seen enough good examples of remakes done well to no longer balk at the announcement of a new one outright (and I’m sure 5 more will be green-lit by the time I’ve finished typ…okay 5 more just got green-lit…); and if early word on the new Evil Dead picture is to be believed then it’s just one more punctured notch into the human-skinned belt of worthwhile horror remakes.

No horror picture is safe from being resuscitated and put back through a brand new shiny meat grinder. Sometimes we get unexpectedly tasty ground sirloin; and sometimes we get mildewy grotesqueness reminiscent of “The Stuff” (which could use a remake).

Talented filmmakers will make a good picture while talented accountants will make money. Sometimes both can be satisfied, and that readily occurs in the production of a horror remake because they’re cheap to make, easy to sell, and fun to play around with. They’re the pancakes of the film industry. Almost any horror picture is capable of being remade well given the right kind of people with the right kind of attitude.

While it feels like everything’s already been remade, there are still a few stragglers that haven’t. Here are 5 that shouldn’t and 10 where an update might not be so bad.

5 Pieces of Sacred Ground


Roman Polanski’s masterpiece of warranted paranoia about a housewife wary of her next door neighbors’ intense involvement and obsessiveness with the care of her unborn child would most likely yield a perverse remake that would foolishly try to be scary. Rosemary’s Baby is one of the horror classics that doesn’t attempt to frighten you so much as make you feel uneasily tense. The terror comes mostly in the final reveal, but up to then, it’s simply a story of who’s to be believed and who is to be trusted.

Unless you got someone with a little bit of maturity behind the camera (and a modern day cast to rival Mia Farrow, John Cassavetes and Ruth Gordon in an Academy Award winning performance) what you’d most likely get is a competent filmmaker caving under the pressure of a studio head to add in a ton of jump scares so the movie could be sold for Halloween, and someone like Jessica Alba to run around pregnantly in her underwear for no real reason.

JAWS (1975)

A remake of Jaws would simply be a whole lot less. Too noticeably less. It’s a timeless movie in almost every regard short of fashion, and truthfully Roy Scheider makes male Daisy Duke-like shorts look pretty damn good. Everything about the picture is so close to flawless that it can’t be replicated. In fact, Spielberg had to mistake his way into a perfect picture about a shark terrorizing the waters of a vacation community.

In order to film a comparable remake of Jaws you’d have to go through hell to do so, and if you’re lucky you’d only be able to say that you attempted to remake Jaws. Jaws is what happens when you get some of the most talented people in the world and place them in the middle of the ocean with a camera and a tuba. The only way you could get something remotely good by remaking it would be to do a mockumentary about a group of people trying their best to do a remake of Jaws.


Hopefully Platinum Dunes never gets their act together on this one. Casting a group of mostly inexperienced middle school actors to carry an entire movie primarily on their charm, chemistry and ability to read Shane Black dialogue is almost like capturing lightning in a bottle. The concept is beyond the realm of cool and sets up camp in the center of Badass Park. A gang of pre-teen horror film enthusiasts realize their small suburban town is gonna get taken over by the forces of evil, lead by the likes of Dracula, The Mummy, the Creature from the Black Lagoon, and two of the more heartfelt and sympathetic portrayals of two of Universal’s key monsters with John Gries as the tormented Wolfman and Tom Noonan as the irresistibly sweet Frankenstein’s monster.

Much like the 4 other pictures on this list, it’s almost impossible to replicate the cast (especially the youngsters), and more so Black’s sharp-witted writing. This is something that Joss Whedon would do and do well, but even Whedon would have a very difficult time finding these types of kids to fill these kinds of roles. Not to mention, Duncan Regehr as Dracula gives one of the more under-noticed portrayals of the character. It’s top 3 of all-time level stuff. A new take on the flick probably wouldn’t be a failure, but it’s most certainly gonna come off as merely a poser.

28 DAYS LATER (2002)

One of the modern masterpieces of horror, Danny Boyle‘s picture single-handedly revitalized a stagnant zombie genre that’s resulted in a cultural zombie boom in the decade since. For the first time in the history of the planet, zombies are sexy and while Boyle’s picture was only a small spark, it helped ignite a humongous flame that was followed by Zack Snyder’s remake of the quintessential zombie picture (Dawn of the Dead), a fantastic sequel, and most recently the phenomenon that is AMC’s The Walking Dead.

While it seems strange to praise the remake of *the* zombie picture done by Zack Snyder and still condemn a potential remake of Danny Boyle’s film it’s more rooted in the fact that the zombie sub-genre of horror shouldn’t ever necessitate a remake of any prior story. The only thing that Snyder’s picture really shared with George Romero’s original was the shopping mall setting. He could have set it inside an IKEA and it still be just as good, even further removed itself from Romero’s movie, and had delicious meatballs for only $2.00. The point is a remake of 28 Days Later wouldn’t be bad, just useless. If you include a zombie in your story, you’re almost 40% close to being a horror movie. No need to borrow the other 60 percent. In fact, spend your time writing the prequel, The 27 Days In Between.


It’s not too soon to think of this as a modern masterpiece of horror. Conceptually, we’re working with satirical brilliance that knows deeply about horror genre conventions and takes them someplace completely unexpected. It is almost impossible to guess what tricks are up this film’s sleeve. This is what happens when you get intelligent, insightful and witty individuals to focus on something as historically juvenile as the slasher genre.

A remake of Cabin in the Woods would only say the same things about a genre that may no longer be bound by the same conventions and probably wouldn’t be nearly as funny. It’s difficult to make an audience laugh at the same joke twice. You’d almost have to hope the horror genre evolves and makes new tropes, but then we wouldn’t have a remake of Cabin in the Woods. It’ll probably be Cameras Irritate Ghosts.

As for these next 10 bad boys, a second go-around may not be too bad of an idea.

Adam Charles has been a film fantatic and unhealthily obsessive purchaser of films he's never seen since the late '90s. He's lived in Austin, TX since 1992 and dropped out of college when he realized his full time job would better fund his dvd (now blu-ray) and movie poster addiction than his passion probably ever could. He is nearly out of financial debt, but it's gonna be another decade or so before he catches up on watching everything he's irresponsibly purhcased. He has written in the past for and, and can be found on twitter as @the_beef - a label he's had since well before Shia LeBeouf was even a sperm and therefore Adam wins.

Read More from Adam Charles
Get Film School Rejects in your email. All the cool kids are doing it:
Previous Article
Next Article
Reject Nation
Leave a comment
Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!