variety-frostnixon

The photo above comes to us from The New York Times’ David Carr, known more fondly as The Bagger. In one of his updates today, Carr points out that both Daily Variety and The Hollywood Reporter have been doing what they always do, allowing their covers to be used for big, loud “For Your Consideration” advertisements. But over the past two weeks, both THR and Daily Variety have been taken over by Universal and Imagine Entertainment’s Frost/Nixon, a serious Best Picture candidate.

As many of you may or may not know, it is customary for studios to throw large amounts of money at campaigns for their Oscar hopefuls. And as Nikki Finke pointed out yesterday, even though studios are in the midst of laying off large portions of their employees, they have continued to buy up FYC ad spots all over the place. The most egregious offender seems to be Paramount, who on the day Viacom took a hatchet to its staffing board, Paramount had a color gatefold ad in Variety for The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button. Cost: $250,000, or as Finke points out “about 5 assistants’ salaries.”

But while many industry pundits, especially Ms. Finke, are calling on studios to be less showy during the economic crisis, my concern turns to the fairness of the Oscar race. The folks who read these trade papers are most often industry workers that make up the Academy. And as we’ve found so often in the box office world, good marketing can deliver results for a subpar movie. This is why Spider-Man 3 made so much on opening weekend, despite being the weakest of its franchise. That said, I’m always weary that films such as Slumdog Millionaire will somehow be overlooked because of a great marketing campaign in support of Benjamin Button or Frost/Nixon. Not to say that those movies aren’t deserving, but they should win on their merits as good films, not the merits of their publicity departments. My hope is that all of the organic buzz generated by Slumdog will be enough to carry it to a Best Picture win. But I suppose we’ll see.

Do you think that “For Your Consideration” advertising is a fair practice? Should the movie with the most money behind it have the best chance at Oscar gold?


ARTICLE TAGS
Like this article? Join thousands of your fellow movie lovers who subscribe to The Weekly Edition from Film School Rejects. Our best articles, every week, right in your inbox!
  %
%  
Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!
Some movie websites serve the consumer. Some serve the industry. At Film School Rejects, we serve at the pleasure of the connoisseur. We provide the best reviews, interviews and features to millions of dedicated movie fans who know what they love and love what they know. Because we, like you, simply love the art of the moving picture.
Fantastic Fest 2014
6 Filmmaking Tips: James Gunn
Got a Tip? Send it here:
editors@filmschoolrejects.com
Publisher:
Neil Miller
Managing Editor:
Scott Beggs
Associate Editors:
Rob Hunter
Kate Erbland
Christopher Campbell
All Rights Reserved © 2006-2014 Reject Media, LLC | Privacy Policy | Design & Development by Face3