Once again it’s time for After Dark Horrorfest, and just like last year Robert Fure refused to watch any of the releases from foreign lands. You’d think he would have grown or matured some in twelve months, but no, he still believes that foreign horror is inferior to our own domestic terrors. I disagree with him on principle of course, but sadly this year’s foreign After Dark titles don’t do much to support my argument that these other countries can create cinema just as scary as our own…

Sadly, Lake Mungo doesn’t do much in support of that argument either. Presented in faux-documentary style, the movie examines the mysterious events following the drowning death of a teenage girl in Australia. Witnesses begin to see her around town and ghostly happenings occur in the girl’s home that keep her family on edge. Throughout the grieving process the family discovers secrets about her that could never have imagined to be true. Is the spirit sticking around because of unfinished business or an unsettled soul?

Kills

Err, one girl drowns off screen.

Ills

The aforementioned drowned girl is found. A corpse that has been underwater for several days is not an attractive sight.

Lust

We see a fuzzy video of a six-legged sex act. I’ll let your imagination wander on that one.

Learning

Much like Catholic school girls and Asians, the quiet ones usually have the most to hide.

Review

Horror films done in documentary style (includes “found footage” films like The Blair Witch Project and Cloverfield) have an immediate hurdle in that we know they’re not real. That fact automatically deflates the intention of the story being true and therefore scarier because it supposedly really happened. But our knowledge of the truth doesn’t automatically make the whole effort a failure. Rec, Paranormal Activity, and The Last Broadcast are examples of movies we know are fake but still manage to scare the piss out of us. It’s all about the presentation, the actors, and most importantly, the story itself. So where does Lake Mungo land?

Well, with one singular exception, the movie is not scary at all. Granted, that one exception is extremely creepy, but it’s not really enough to carry the entire film. To it’s credit the story truly does not go where you expect, and in that regard the movie works because it keeps the viewer on their toes as to what’s happening. But as a horror movie there aren’t nearly enough scenes or moments of terror. People talk about things that happened. We see some images. People talk some more. Aside from the exception mentioned above, there’s no sustained atmosphere. Assumptions are made and inferred only to be debunked later on. That’s not to say the movie isn’t interesting at times… it just isn’t a horror movie.

grade needed

Click here to read more from The Coroner’s Report


ARTICLE TAGS
Like this article? Join thousands of your fellow movie lovers who subscribe to The Weekly Edition from Film School Rejects. Our best articles, every week, right in your inbox!
  %
%  
Comment Policy: No hate speech allowed. If you must argue, please debate intelligently. Comments containing selected keywords or outbound links will be put into moderation to help prevent spam. Film School Rejects reserves the right to delete comments and ban anyone who doesn't follow the rules. We also reserve the right to modify any curse words in your comments and make you look like an idiot. Thank You!
Some movie websites serve the consumer. Some serve the industry. At Film School Rejects, we serve at the pleasure of the connoisseur. We provide the best reviews, interviews and features to millions of dedicated movie fans who know what they love and love what they know. Because we, like you, simply love the art of the moving picture.
Comic-Con 2014
Summer Box Office Prediction Challenge
Got a Tip? Send it here:
editors@filmschoolrejects.com
Publisher:
Neil Miller
Managing Editor:
Scott Beggs
Associate Editors:
Rob Hunter
Kate Erbland
Christopher Campbell
All Rights Reserved © 2006-2014 Reject Media, LLC | Privacy Policy | Design & Development by Face3